Freedom of speech and freedom of the press are some of the important constitutionally-protected rights that citizens hold. Without the protection of these rights, critical thought and the communication of ideas become nearly impossible. In the Western canon, figures such as John Milton, John Locke, and William Blackstone wrote extensively on liberty, speech, and the law. By the time of the American founding, a uniquely American view of freedom of speech and the press had been established.
As early as the 1730s, the American colonists were contradicting British common law in the trial of John Peter Zenger, showing a strong commitment to the protection of truthful speech. Zenger was arrested in 1733 for publishing The New York Weekly Journal, a newspaper that was consistently critical of the colonial governor of New York. Zenger’s counsel argued, contrary to the common law standard of seditious libel, that the truth of his newspaper’s claims should be considered as grounds for his defense. Despite the colonial judge’s firm instructions to the jury that their duty was to decide only whether he had in fact published the essays in question, the jury acquitted Zenger in a bold act of “jury nullification.”
The American zeal for freedom of expression influenced the founders’ decision to include freedom of speech and freedom of the press in the first amendment of the Bill of Rights. Since the founding, free speech has remained controversial, particularly during times of war or, more recently, in the context of the college campus. The introduction of the internet and social media have added further complication to how and when citizens express their right to speech.
Free Speech Week is an annual nonpartisan holiday that takes place during the third week of October and celebrates freedom of speech and freedom of the press. Free Speech Week was created in 2005 by the Media Institute and the National Association of Broadcaster’s Education Foundation as “National Freedom of Speech Week.” Since then, Free Speech Week has become independent of any organization, though the Media Institute still maintains the official website. The unofficial designation, though fairly recent and neither state nor federal in origin, is significant nonetheless: Free Speech Week encourages individuals, educators, and organizations to raise awareness of the history and value of free speech.
Below is a collection of resources on free speech, its history, its controversies, and its important role in the press and higher education. Browse these resources or jump from section to section by clicking the links below:
JMC’s First Amendment Library:
The Jack Miller Center’s website has a treasure trove of resources on freedom of speech. The JMC First Amendment Library includes sections on the history, law, and theory behind freedom of speech. Learn about the most fundamental origins of the right to free speech, the American view of it, and controversies that have arisen in the past 232 years.
The Free Speech History section provides a historical timeline of free speech. Browse primary documents and resources that span hundreds of years, from Socratic political philosophy, to the American founding, to controversial U.S. government leaks of recent years.
The Free Speech Law section traces the development of American laws pertaining to freedom of speech. Beginning with the original founding documents, this section of the library touches on the legal complications of sedition, offensive speech, and libel and defamation.
The Free Speech Theory section provides an overview of free speech’s role in political theory and scholarly thought. Our library includes the political theory of Aristotle, John Milton, and John Locke, who influenced the American founders, as well as several contemporary theorists, including Stanley Fish and Catherine MacKinnon.
Declarations of Independence and Rights
When the tension between the colonists and the British crown came to a head with a violent confrontation between British soldiers and the Massachusetts militia in April of 1775, American leaders from the thirteen colonies convened a Continental Congress to organize an army to fight for their independence. In July of the following year, this Congress issued a declaration of the colonies’ independence from Great Britain. This declaration justified the colonies’ rebellion by stating “self-evident” “truths” about the purpose and foundation of government and by explaining how the British government had consistently failed to meet the standards of those truths. This articulation of a classical liberal conception of government, based on equality and natural rights, would serve as the moral foundation of the United States’ Constitution.
The Continental Congress’s Declaration of Independence was not, however, the only public defense of the states’ break with the crown; nor was it the only public statement of their political principles. Individual states issued their own declarations of rights and of independence, both as stand-alone resolutions and as parts of new state constitutions. The most famous of these is the Virginia Declaration of Rights, which preceded the Continental Declaration by nearly a month. The Virginia Declaration departs from earlier documents in its articulation of the purpose of government as a protector of natural rights. Its language is recognizable both in the national Declaration of Independence in subsequent declarations and constitutions of other states.
The original Constitution of the United States proposed for ratification by the Federal Convention of 1787 lacked any explicit reference to freedom of speech or of the press. According to the Federalist Framers of the Constitution, explicit provisions for such freedoms as speech and the press were unnecessary, since the Constitution granted only certain narrow powers to Congress. They argued that by including a Bill of Rights, which seemed to imply such a Bill was necessary, the Constitution might taken as implying that the Congress had more power than it did. Despite this argument, the absence of a Bill of Rights was incredibly unpopular and nearly cost it its ratification.
Only a month after the Constitution was printed and distributed, the first ratifying convention took place in Pennsylvania. The ratification process went relatively smoothly for a couple months after that, with five state conventions approving ratification with little difficulty. In January of 1788, however, the ratifying convention in Massachusetts devolved into a bitter and even violent deadlock, largely over the question of a bill of rights. Only by promising to introduce a Bill of Rights as amendments were the Federalist supporters of the Constitution able to break the deadlock and secure ratification in Massachusetts. Without this strategy, which was subsequently adopted in other states with Federalist minorities, the Constitution could not have been ratified. Despite the reservations of many of the Federalists, who had a commanding majority in the first Congress, James Madison recognized the necessity of keeping their promise and adding a Bill of Rights quickly in order to secure the legitimacy of the new government. He submitted a proposal for seventeen amendments based on the Virginia Declaration of rights early in 1789. This proposal went through four stages of rigorous debate and revision in the House and the Senate before being approved by Congress in September of 1789. Of the twelve articles in the approved amendments, ten were ratified as by the states over the course of the next two years, becoming what is now known as our Bill of Rights. The first of these ten included the provision that “Congress shall make no law … abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press.”
Pivotal Free Speech Supreme Court Cases
People v. Croswell (1804)
Despite their complaints over the Federalists’ use of the Alien and Sedition Acts to prosecute the opposition, Republicans did not hesitate to prosecute Federalist opposition for libel at the state level once they won the presidency with the election of Thomas Jefferson in 1800. Croswell published a small paper called The Wasp, which aggressively criticized Thomas Jefferson and other Republican public officials. When he was a arrested and convicted on charges of libel and sedition by the State of New York, Croswell appealed to the Supreme Court of New York, where he was defended by Alexander Hamilton and James Kent. Though the judges were evenly split and the conviction stood, the case gave a high-profile occasional for Hamilton and Kent to make a case for permitting truth as a defense against libel charges.
Schenck v. United States (1919)
Selected online resources on Freedom of Speech:
The official Free Speech Week website offers numerous resources, lesson plans, free speech quotes, and activity ideas. Its purpose is to raise public awareness of the importance of freedom of speech and of a free press in the United States – and to celebrate that freedom. The non-partisan, non-ideological event is intended to be a unifying celebration.
The Library of Congress offers a a digital collection of primary sources tracking the development and passage of the Bill of Rights. The collection includes selections from the papers of Washington, Jefferson, and Madison, as well as newspapers of the time.
The National Constitution Center offers a collection of introductory essays by top liberal and conservative legal scholars that give overviews of each amendment clause as agreed upon by both authors, as well as separate brief statements of these scholars’ disagreements about the meaning of each clause. For the First Amendment, the NCC offers analysis from Geoffrey Stone and Eugene Volokh.
The Heritage Foundation’s Guide to the Constitution includes scholarly essays on each component of the First Amendment, including freedom of speech and of the press.
In March 2019, the National Constitution Center held a series of panels in which professors, administrators, and student advocates discussed and debated freedom of speech on campus. Panelists included Amy Wax, Anita Bernstein, and Tom Sullivan. The panels were recorded and are available on the NCC website.
*If you are a JMC fellow who’s published on freedom of speech, the First Amendment, or their histories and controversies, and would like your work included here, send it to us at email@example.com.